TUCSON CRIME FREE COALITION - AUGUST 2026 Newsletter
TUCSON CRIME FREE COALITION
MEMBER NEWSLETTER • AUGUST 31, 2026
THIS WEEK
This week’s newsletter looks at the same issue from four angles: accountability. We begin with a broader conversation about crime, addiction and homelessness, then look at a California city taking a more direct approach to chronic street homelessness. From there, we turn to a violent attack in Sam Hughes and close with our special report on the criminal history and plea agreement behind the murder charge in the killing of TPD recruit Carlos Ramirez.
Tucson’s Problems Are Not Complicated. What Has Been Missing Is the Will to Fix Them.
TCFC co founder Josh Jacobsen recently joined Edmund Marquez on The Upside for a wide ranging conversation about crime, addiction, homelessness, public transportation and the lack of accountability that continues to make these problems worse in Tucson.
MUST WATCH: https://youtu.be/8kiwtiIcIBk?si=Q8VzuH2SihIX6fCz
For more than four years, TCFC has worked to understand these issues from every angle by spending time with law enforcement, service providers, business owners, neighborhood residents, elected officials and people living on the streets. What we continue to find is that Tucson does not suffer from a lack of people trying to help. The larger problem is that our systems are disconnected, accountability has eroded and too many decisions are being driven by politics instead of measurable results.
The conversation also gets into the line between compassion and enabling, why more police officers alone cannot fix a criminal justice system that repeatedly cycles the same offenders back onto the street, and why TCFC believes services have to be paired with accountability if we want different outcomes.
TCFC has always believed that pointing out problems is not enough. We helped advocate for the Pima County Transition Center, which connects people leaving jail with navigators and services, and that same focus on solutions led to the creation of the Nexus for Hope, a technology platform designed to improve coordination between providers and measure which programs are actually working.
What we want for Tucson is straightforward: fewer overdose deaths, less crime, cleaner neighborhoods, safer public transportation, better treatment outcomes and more accountability throughout the system. Tucson can be safer, cleaner and more prosperous if we are willing to acknowledge what is not working and change course.
Santa Ana Is Taking a Different Approach. Should Tucson?
A recent TCFC video highlighted Santa Ana Mayor Valerie Amezcua, who has become increasingly direct about how her city is dealing with chronic street homelessness. Santa Ana sends Quality of Life teams into the community seven days a week to offer shelter, detox, addiction treatment and mental health services. Amezcua’s position is that when help is offered, refused and laws continue to be broken, there must be accountability. She has described leaving people on the street as inhumane and argues that residents should also be able to use parks, sidewalks and business districts safely.
WATCH: https://youtube.com/shorts/vV0fF0PXj3g?si=4lnK_x8MWSHODYX2
This is more than a sound bite. Santa Ana operates a 200 bed Navigation Center, spends millions on outreach and expanded its anti camping rules after the 2024 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Grants Pass. The city gives officers enforcement tools while also allowing people to be taken to services instead of jail when they agree to accept help. CBS Los Angeles reported that during one operation this month, 69 people were jailed, 11 accepted shelter and one was reunited with family. Santa Ana’s unsheltered Point in Time count also declined from 871 in 2024 to 714 in 2026, a decrease of about 18 percent. That number alone does not prove the policy caused the decline, but it should get our attention.
Tucson already has many of the pieces. The issue is, laws are not being enforced, citizens are simply getting lip service from elected officials, and Tucson is struggling as a result.
That leaves Tucson with a question worth debating. Should we adopt a clearer model where dedicated teams offer real shelter and treatment options, but public spaces are not surrendered when those services are refused and laws continue to be broken? Compassion and accountability do not have to compete with one another. Santa Ana is testing what happens when a city insists on both.
SHOULD TUCSON TAKE A SIMILAR APPROACH?
Watch the accompanying TCFC video and tell us whether Tucson should consider a similar model.
Sources: CBS Los Angeles • Voice of OC • City of Santa Ana • City of Tucson Safe City
The policy debate is important, but the consequences of public safety failures are personal. This week a woman in Sam Hughes agreed to speak with TCFC about a violent attack outside her home and why she believes Tucson needs to pay closer attention to the safety of women in our community.
Woman Attacked in Sam Hughes, Suspect Taken Into Custody
A frightening attack in Tucson’s Sam Hughes neighborhood is another reminder that violent crime is not confined to any one part of our community. The victim told TCFC that she noticed a man walking across the street who stopped and made eye contact with her before approaching her gate, raising his fist and attacking her.
WATCH: https://youtube.com/shorts/FYuR2NAAYGQ?si=QWdtCRunG5n9q4U2
She attempted to defend herself before the man tackled her, knocking her into a cactus and striking her repeatedly. She told TCFC that her jaw took much of the impact, and after the attack she turned to social media to share what had happened and ask the community for help.
The community responded and information spread quickly. Tucson Police eventually located the man near River Road and Campbell Avenue. According to the update shared with TCFC, the suspect was identified as Henry Roberts and had multiple misdemeanor warrants outstanding when he was taken into custody.
She wanted to tell her story for a larger reason because other women have contacted her with similar experiences, and she believes Tucson residents need to understand the violence women are encountering in our community. The suspect is now in custody, and the next question is whether our criminal justice system will hold him accountable.
WATCH AND SHARE HER STORY
An arrest is only the beginning of accountability, which leads directly into the special report below. TCFC examined the documented criminal history and 2024 plea agreement involving Alex James Barnett, the man now charged with first degree murder in the killing of Tucson Police recruit Carlos Ramirez, to ask a question that deserves a clear answer: why was he free on August 19, 2026?
TCFC SPECIAL REPORT • AUGUST 2026
Released to Reoffend: The Record Behind the Murder Charge in the Killing of Recruit Carlos Ramirez
How the Pima County Attorney's Office pled a violent, ten-time convicted felon down to Arizona's lowest felony class — and put him back on our streets months before a Tucson police recruit was gunned down in his own home.
In the early morning hours of August 19, two masked men broke into a home on Tucson's southwest side. Carlos Ramirez, 23, a former Pima County corrections officer who was eight days from graduating the Tucson Police Department academy, fought the intruders to protect his pregnant fiancée and their child. He was shot in the chest and died at the scene. His fiancée, herself a county corrections officer, was shot and wounded. Investigators say the attackers had no known connection to either victim — a random home invasion.
WATCH: https://youtube.com/shorts/ihWDQi1VtwY?si=UMvkEBiOWKVyiLzc
On August 24, after a three-hour SWAT standoff, Alex James Barnett, 33, surrendered to authorities. He is charged with first-degree murder, armed robbery, and aggravated assault, and is being held without bond.
Those charges are accusations; Mr. Barnett is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.
But here is what is not an accusation. It is documented, page by page, in the certified court records of the Pima County Superior Court, and it raises a question every Tucsonan deserves answered: why was Alex Barnett free on August 19, 2026?
Help grow our non-partisan coalition and making Tucson safer and more prosperous:
Click below:
DONATE: https://donorbox.org/thanks-for-donating-to-tcfc
You are asking & We are delivering
The Tucson Crime Free Coalition has had a significant number of requests from community members and business owners asking how The City of Tucson works and who to contact with concerns, problems and or questions. We have also found that many residents are unsure of which Ward they live in. To help with this, we have included in this newsletter a City Ward Map so you can easily identify your direct council representatives although we recommend contacting ALL of them with your concerns and questions.
To help residents take action, we have compiled a complete list of the Mayor and City Council along with their contact information. We encourage you to reach out directly and share what you are experiencing. You are more than welcome to include and provide pictures and movies for proof that you have. This can include but is not limited to
● Trespassing on private property
● Encampments
● Fires set on public property
● Street Racing
● Boarded-up or abandoned buildings
● Businesses closing due to on-going crime
● Safety concerns for yourself, your children or grandchildren
● Poor road conditions
● Concerns about the Cities $2,410,000,000 budget and them not being able to control spending
● Free Buses and the problems that has created
● The drug addiction and mental illness problem all over Tucson
We strongly encourage you to email The Mayor and all of the Council, so they can receive a full and accurate picture of what is happening across the whole city and hopefully see that this is not normal. This is one of the most effective ways to communicate concerns - and it ensures you have a record that your voice was heard. We have made this very easy - all you need to do is “copy and paste” all of the email addresses into the To: section of your email.

Copy and Paste these email addresses into the To: section of your email:mayor.romero@tucsonaz.gov, ward1@tucsonaz.gov, ward2@tucsonaz.gov,ward3@tucsonaz.gov, ward4@tucsonaz.gov, ward5@tucsonaz.gov, ward6@tucsonaz.gov, help@tucsoncrimefree.com




https://www.kvoa.com/news/crime/3-men-killed-in-midtown-tucson-homicide/article_5a27629d-77e7-4b14-98b7-6df2fc366547.html (actually THREE deceased). We’re on a roll here in Tucson.
For full accountability and transparency, please list the authors of and contributors to this article. (As would be provided in a credible source of information.) Thank you.
Maybe it’s time to consider a few things: 1) We happened to be able to observe this “pursuit” and then ultimate detention in real time, reading the numerous posts and pictures. Our sense is that the publication of all this information “pressured” the PD to respond. (Police scanners encryption)(Note: all the warrants, there is a bus driver who says she was familiar with this guy “…and the police are also.” It just doesn’t make sense he would be allowed out and about. So, seeing how effective the community response was (many people wanted to go out and look for the guy….and may have), this is going to sound crazy, but if our police force is insufficient in size to get the job done, and they are being advised not to enforce certain laws, maybe we should defund it? What’s this going to cost us now? 2) The m&cc have created this dilemma by shrinking the PD force. Incidents like this are foreseeable. The m&cc “welcome” these people here. Their obligation should extend to vetting them appropriately, not just tuning them loose on the community. So duty, foreseeability, creating the conditions under which this can occur-does this equal liability? Crazy?? Think about it. Giver us one SANE reason why we have to live like this? Why do we have to live with crime? Why do we accept this criminal behavior as the status quo? Are we so used to it that we can’t think there are alternatives? As they say, follow the money, who benefits from this? Who is making money on this continuous criminal behavior? And while you’re looking at the crime, the distraction, what is really going on here?
Leave a comment